Phoenix voters have the chance to re-elect or boot the mayor this November, but the most competitive race is a vacant seat representing parts of downtown and the southwest portion of the city.
There are two contests for the vacant District 7 seat: a special election to hold the position through April 2025, and a regular election to hold the seat for a permanent 4-year term starting in April 2025. Three candidates are running for the temporary seat and four candidates are vying for the full-term contest.
But voters will also weigh in on incumbents: Should Mayor Kate Gallego, Vice Mayor Debra Stark and Councilmember Betty Guardado get another term? The mayor represents all city voters. Stark in District 3 represents the Moon Valley and Sunnyslope area. Guardado in District 5 represents the Maryvale area. Each incumbent is facing one challenger, while Councilwoman Ann O’Brien, who represents northwest Phoenix, is running unopposed.
Early voting begins on Oct. 9. Those who want to participate in the election must register to vote by Oct. 7. Voters can also check their status or request a mail-in ballot on Maricopa County’s website. Those who choose to vote by mail are advised to mail their ballot by Oct. 29 or drop it off at a ballot drop-off location or voting location by Nov. 5.
The Arizona Republic asked candidates running for 4-year terms a series of questions on the most pressing issues in Phoenix and in their districts. Here is what they had to say, in alphabetical order. Some answers were trimmed to meet the word limit set for all.
Skip ahead to view answers from the specific race you want to see: Mayoral | District 1 | District 3 | District 5 | District 7
Priorities: Why are you running for Phoenix mayor?
Why are you running to be the mayor of Phoenix, and what is your first priority?
Matt Evans, challenger: I’m running to be mayor because our current mayor has absolutely failed our city and the people of Phoenix, and she is ruining our community. As a proud native of Phoenix, I care deeply about the future of our city. Many people are looking to move out because of Kate Gallego’s policies, but I’m not willing to leave; I’m here to fight back. My top priority is addressing homelessness and cleaning up our streets. Under Gallego’s leadership, we’ve seen a rise in homelessness and a lack of effective solutions, leaving many residents feeling unsafe in their own neighborhoods. It’s time for real change—leadership that puts the people of Phoenix first and works tirelessly to solve the pressing issues we face. We need a mayor who is committed to transparency, accountability, and making Phoenix a city where everyone can thrive. Kate Gallego is a Harvard-educated elitist millionaire transplanted into Phoenix, and she has no real pride in this city.
Kate Gallego, incumbent: I’m running for re-election for the same reason I ran five years ago: to build a better Phoenix for everyone, and to prepare us for the future. Together, we’ve accomplished so much. The world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing is taking place here, bringing good-paying jobs. We’ve made meaningful investments in public safety and expanded healthcare options. For moms like me, that matters. And through significant investment, we’ve built or saved 40,000 housing units to address today’s housing crisis. Each year we create more and better options to house our unsheltered community and to give those individuals better access to jobs. I know we can keep that momentum going. Another area where I work to continue to make a difference is on protecting our water supply. Central Arizona has low priority water rights on the Colorado River, and as a desert city, we have to put our water supply at the forefront of our planning. I’ve prioritized projects that will safeguard our water over the long term, including advanced water purification, and I’ll continue to do that in a second term.
Inspiration: Who shapes the Phoenix mayoral candidates’ thinking?
Who in public life, past or present, do you admire most? Why? And what lesson do you draw from that person’s experience?
Evans: I admire Tupac Shakur. While he’s primarily known as a rapper, Tupac was also an activist who spoke out about social issues, injustice, and the struggles of the underrepresented. He had a profound ability to capture the realities of life in his music, and he wasn’t afraid to challenge the system. What I admire most is his passion for speaking the truth, even when it wasn’t popular. Like Tupac, I believe we need leaders who are willing to speak honestly about the issues affecting our communities, which is something Phoenix has been missing under Kate Gallego’s leadership.
Gallego: There are many people I admire, but one I’ve been thinking of lately is Mo Udall, who represented Arizona in Congress for three decades. He cared deeply about Arizona’s people and its natural resources and prided himself on being a “work horse rather than a show horse” who delivered real results that improved people’s lives. And he did it with a sense of humor. Congressman Udall took on complex problems and had deep commitment to civil conflict resolution. I appreciate that he sought out people who didn’t necessarily agree with him in order to arrive at the best solutions for Arizonans—a trait that is hard to come by these days in many elected officials. He also had a lot of fun doing the work and even published a compilation of political jokes. I aspire to follow his lead in all of these areas, except for writing a joke book.
Taxing and spending: Where do the Phoenix mayoral candidates stand?
If you were faced with a steep budget deficit and you had to either raise taxes or cut services, which, specifically, would you consider first and why?
Evans: I will never support raising taxes. Phoenix families are already struggling with the high cost of living, and we can’t add to their burden. If faced with a budget deficit, my priority would be to look for inefficiencies in the city’s spending and cut wasteful programs that aren’t benefiting the community. Under Kate Gallego’s leadership, the city has lost trust in how its money is spent because it hasn’t yielded the results she promised. We’ve seen reckless spending on initiatives that don’t solve critical issues like homelessness and public safety. It’s time for smarter, leaner operations that focus on real solutions and ensure that every dollar works for the people of Phoenix. Kate Gallego is controlled by her campaign donors.
Gallego: Phoenix is likely to face a budget deficit because of short-sighted decisions at the State Capitol. The former governor’s ill-advised “flat tax,” the state’s runaway spending on school vouchers, combined with the deep cuts the State Legislature made last year to city budgets, is forcing us to do more with less—and it poses a risk to public safety. Our first step is to tighten our belts at City Hall, and we’re doing that. I don’t like to raise taxes, and when I first ran for mayor, I even was criticized for voting against a property tax increase. But I refuse to let our police officers and firefighters go without the tools they need, I refuse to let our parks and libraries go into disrepair, and I refuse to stop making the investments we need to protect our water supply.
Election integrity: Where do the Phoenix mayoral candidates stand?
Do you think Arizona elections are fairly run? Do you trust the results? Will you abide by them? Why or why not?
Evans: It’s time we move forward from the controversies of the past and focus on what matters: electing a mayor based on their policy positions and their ability to lead Phoenix into the future.
Gallego: I have always been unequivocal in my belief that Arizona elections are fairly run. I trust the results of our free and fair elections, and I will abide by them.
Affordable housing: What are Phoenix mayoral candidates’ plans to help?
Despite efforts by city staff and the City Council to address the housing crisis by easing the process for builders and incentivizing affordable housing, the shortage and lack of affordability persists. How do you propose solving this crisis, and what roles do you believe both the city and the state should play in addressing the issue?
Evans: Kate Gallego is a millionaire mayor backed by special interests like San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria and billionaire sports owner Jerry Reinsdorf. She’s more focused on maintaining those relationships than addressing the needs of Phoenix’s working and middle-class residents. To truly solve the housing crisis, we need to take action that benefits the people of Phoenix, not just those with deep pockets. This includes balancing the impact of short-term vacation rentals, like Airbnbs, on housing inventory to ensure that residents have access to affordable homes. The city and state must collaborate to create solutions that protect housing for everyday Phoenicians. We need to build affordable housing, not the luxury housing we see being developed in our city under Gallego’s leadership. Gallego’s failure to take meaningful action has left Phoenix struggling with a crisis that continues to hurt families and communities.
Gallego: Phoenix has done a great deal to build new housing. We’ve cut red tape to streamline the process for developers and have supported the building or preservation of 40,000 housing units since 2020. That’s a lot of homes! But the challenge we face is a dynamic one. Hedge fund property investors are increasingly taking homes out of the market for families to own, and short-term rentals are doing the same. More people are moving here from other states because the Valley is such a great place to live. Construction costs have gone up, and with interest rates riding high until recently, financing has become more challenging too. Collectively, it’s created a mess for the local housing market. Moving forward, we’ll utilize the $55 million that Phoenix voters approved for affordable housing in our General Obligation Bond election, update our Housing Phoenix plan, and work to grow the construction workforce. We want to expand our program to help residents make the down payment on their mortgages, make more public land available for affordable housing, address challenges in financing those projects, and urge the State Legislature to give us more authority to rein in short-term rentals.
Police reform: Where do Phoenix mayoral candidates stand on federal oversight?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into the City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department and found multiple constitutional violations related to discrimination and excessive use of force. How do you feel about federal oversight of the Phoenix police, and what do you think the city should do to improve Phoenix policing and repair trust with those wary of the department?
Evans: Phoenix is now facing hundreds of millions of dollars fighting the DOJ because of Kate Gallego’s failure. Let’s not forget that Gallego was on the City Council before becoming mayor, and every incident in the DOJ investigation happened under her watch. As mayor, I will not support federal oversight in any form—whether a consent decree or a technical assistance letter. The solution isn’t more federal involvement, but rather replacing Kate Gallego with leadership that understands how to bring accountability and transparency to Phoenix’s police department. We can resolve this issue by focusing on reforms that restore trust between the police and the community while also ensuring officers have the support and tools they need to do their jobs effectively.
Gallego: I deeply appreciate our police officers, and I’m grateful to each and every one of them who take great risks every day to keep our city and its people safe. The overwhelming majority of the time, our officers get it right. But sometimes, we do get it wrong. When we do, there must be accountability, and we need to learn from our mistakes. I’m proud of the improvements we have made over the years—we deployed body cameras to improve transparency, created specialized police teams with advanced crisis response training, and invested in resources so that an armed police officer isn’t the first responder to every situation—such as a person experiencing homelessness or a mental health crisis. It has been my goal since day one to give our residents the best possible police department, and it’s work that I want to continue. Alongside Councilwoman Kesha Hodge Washington and Councilman Kevin Robinson, I have put forward a series of significant changes for our police department that address areas the Department of Justice and the city’s Office of Accountability and Transparency have identified for improvement. I am interested in working with the Department of Justice to strengthen the police department outside of a consent decree.
Vision: What do Phoenix mayoral candidates see as the city’s future?
If you are elected mayor, what will Phoenix look like four years from now? What changes will be tangible, and what other changes will be underway?
Evans: In four years, Phoenix will be cleaner, safer, and more affordable for all its residents. My top priority is addressing homelessness and cleaning up the streets, something Kate Gallego has failed to do. We will also create an environment where small businesses can thrive, and unlike Gallego, I won’t advocate for extreme policies like banning meat or dairy, which hurt working families. My administration will ensure complete transparency, unlike Kate Gallego, who got caught using the Signal app to have secret conversations with city officials. I’ll use my background in technology to build systems that give residents real-time access to data, so you’ll know exactly how your government is working for you. Phoenix will be a city where the people—not special interests—are heard and represented.
Gallego: In four years, Phoenix will have greater opportunity for everyone. We’ve built the foundation for an economy with more good jobs than ever before, better access to quality health care options, more education opportunities, improved parks and public spaces, and more fire stations. Phoenicians will be able to enjoy a redeveloped Rio Salado with new businesses, beautiful recreation paths, and preserved natural ecosystems. And we’ll see investments we made in the last few years unfold in real time: stronger small businesses, a brand-new ASU Medical School downtown, a long-awaited Latino Cultural Center, and a first-of-its-kind science and technology park around the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation campus in north Phoenix. I’m so incredibly excited for what’s ahead for our city.
Trust: Why should voters trust you to be Phoenix mayor?
Phoenix is the fifth most populous city in the U.S. and the growth shows no signs of slowing: Why should voters trust you to best lead Phoenix, and what qualifications do you have that show you’re capable?
Evans: I’m not running to be mayor; I’m running to make a difference. I’m a regular guy and a Phoenix native, focused on what truly matters to our community. Kate Gallego allowed the Zone, a homeless encampment, to grow unchecked for years until a judge forced the city to declare it a public nuisance. Under my leadership, it will be the first time in Phoenix history that the people are truly represented. We need to show Kate Gallego that it’s the residents of Phoenix who call the shots, not special interests. With my background in technology and commitment to transparency, I’ll ensure our government prioritizes the needs of our community and effectively addresses issues like homelessness and public safety. It’s time to say, “Hasta luego, Kate Gallego,” and bring in leadership that truly cares about the people of Phoenix.
Gallego: We’re growing because the investments we’ve made in our economy are paying off and because this is simply one of the best places in the world to live. Yet the challenges we have to keep Phoenix—and Arizona—strong during this time of continued growth are immense: pressure on our water system during a time of continued drought, keeping the Valley affordable for working families, protecting our people and infrastructure during times of extreme heat. I’ve learned in this job that to succeed you have to have the ability to manage many irons in the fire at one time and have the vision to see how they all—in some way—fit together. Despite the many challenges of the last five years—drought, the pandemic, and continued cuts from the state—Phoenix has emerged even stronger because we worked together. I know we can accomplish even more during the next four years.
Priorities: Why are you running for Phoenix council?
Why are you running for Phoenix City Council, and what is your first priority?
Ayensa Millan, challenger: Being a first-generation immigrant has shaped my perspective on the American Dream and its many forms—be it accessing quality education, building a family, or becoming a homeowner. I firmly believe that local government holds the key to profoundly influencing people’s daily lives. This conviction has led me to run for the Phoenix City Council, as I see it as the most effective platform to fulfill my mission to empower others to pursue their aspirations. My first priority will be to take an entirely different approach to communicating with residents and business owners in my Council District. If elected, I plan to utilize both digital and traditional methods to clearly and frequently communicate my priorities and positions on items on the City Council’s agenda. I want the days of wondering where your Councilmember stands on important issues to be a thing of the past.
Debra Stark, incumbent: My entire career has been one of public service in the field of city planning. I have a passion for cities. Being on Council allows me to continue to serve the public and ensure we maintain our quality of life in Phoenix. It is difficult to say what is my priority, but addressing affordable housing is probably at the top.
Inspiration: Who shapes the Phoenix council candidates’ thinking?
Who in public life, past or present, do you admire most? Why? And what lesson do you draw from that person’s experience?
Millan: Dolores Huerta has been an inspiration in my work as an attorney representing some of the most vulnerable members of our community. As a labor leader and civil rights icon, Dolores has shown me and so many others the power of persistence and determination to make a difference in people’s lives. I was lucky to first meet Dolores over a decade ago, and the time gone by has only deepened my respect and admiration for this incredible human being.
Stark: I have two, and they are local: Mary Rose Wilcox because she always went the extra mile for her constituents and Thelda Williams who always valued everyone’s opinion in making decisions.
Taxing and spending: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
If you were faced with a steep budget deficit and you had to either raise taxes or cut services, which, specifically, would you consider first and why?
Millan: Regardless of how such a steep deficit occurs, residents and business owners rightfully expect the City Council to balance the city’s budget. I believe that no one group or business sector should bear a disproportionate share of the burden, so a mix of tax increases and cuts to spending should be on the table. However, responsible budgeting means preparing for such a scenario—whether it’s caused by an economic downturn or a hit in revenue that is outside of the city’s control, such as the elimination of the rental tax by the State Legislature. That is why we should make structural changes now in the way we approach providing essential services, so that we can deliver them more effectively and efficiently. One way to do this would be to pursue more partnerships with nonprofits, faith organizations and other groups that are providing similar services to people in our city. More effective community-government partnerships will help eliminate overlap in services and create more durable bonds between the city and those we are trying to help.
Stark: If we face a deficit, I will talk about both taxes and cutting programs. I would first look at our programs and ask, “are we duplicating services that other levels of governments perform?” If we are, I would start with those programs such as public health. Maricopa County Public Health has a robust agency, and we may need to ask them to provide more for our residents. I would then question whether we should be paying dues to organizations that provide some of the services we perform such as economic development or lobbying efforts. I would then look at user fees. Perhaps, we increase fees for the use of playfields for example. And if necessary, I would look at our sales tax and see if a slight increase could assist in paying for core services.
Election integrity: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
Do you think Arizona elections are fairly run? Do you trust the results? Will you abide by them? Why or why not?
Millan: I have confidence in the integrity of Arizona’s elections. The dedicated election officials at the local, county, and state level work diligently to ensure fair and accurate results, and I place my trust in their efforts. I commit to combating false narratives and misinformation that aim to sow division within our community regarding our electoral process.
Stark: I do and will trust the results. I believe we have a great group of professionals that oversee the process.
Affordable housing: What are Phoenix council candidates’ plans to help?
Despite efforts by city staff and the City Council to address the housing crisis by easing the process for builders and incentivizing affordable housing, the shortage and lack of affordability persists. How do you propose solving this crisis, and what roles do you believe both the city and the state should play in addressing the issue?
Millan: There are many structural issues that stand in the way of housing creation—especially at the more affordable end of the spectrum. But despite the many challenges, we cannot let up in our efforts to address the generational challenge of making housing attainable for all. District 3 is home to some of the few remaining areas in Phoenix where working families can still find housing they can reasonably afford. If elected, I will prioritize addressing the housing supply shortage. My plan involves intensifying efforts to collaborate with community development organizations to pinpoint new workforce housing initiatives, with a particular focus of mine on projects within our immediate area. This strategy aims to significantly boost the availability of attainable housing options for our hardworking residents. But the city cannot do it alone — especially without the tools denied us by the State Legislature, such as inclusionary zoning. I trust that the people of Arizona will elect legislators that are more willing to partner with cities and towns to address our shared housing crisis.
Stark: The city must continue to look at improving processes and incentivizing affordable housing. For example, we can assign development teams in our city who focus on solely helping expedite permitting for affordable housing project. We should look at waiving fees for projects that are affordable, such as what the city of Glendale did. We should continue to work from a regional perspective to ensure all cities and towns are building affordable housing. The state should provide funding for more affordable housing and continue to work with cities and towns to seek ways the state can assist all our communities.
Police reform: Where do Phoenix council candidates stand on federal oversight?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into the City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department and found multiple constitutional violations related to discrimination and excessive use of force. How do you feel about federal oversight of the Phoenix police, and what do you think the city should do to improve Phoenix policing and repair trust with those wary of the department?
Millan: My experience on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Community Advisory Board has given me unique insight into the complex relationship between law enforcement and the community they protect. This role has also provided me with a deep understanding of the financial, operational, and reputational impacts that a consent decree can have on a law enforcement agency. While I would prefer to avoid subjecting the Phoenix Police Department and our city’s residents to such burdens, we cannot ignore the issues highlighted in the Department of Justice’s report. It’s a disservice to our dedicated and brave officers to overlook identified problems within the Department by failing to provide necessary additional resources and training. Furthermore, we risk doing a disservice to our taxpayers if we continue to expose the city to potentially costly litigation over police practices and procedures. Addressing these issues head-on —in consultation with community leaders and elected officials — is not only the right thing to do for our officers and the people they are sworn to protect, it’s also fiscally responsible.
Stark: Since the announcement of the actual investigation, the Police Department has been aggressively working on improvements including revising the use of force policy, training, and forming the Civilian Oversight Commission. Unfortunately, the DOJ does not want to acknowledge what our city has been doing. I have read the report, and I am not willing to agree to a consent decree. However, I do think we need to continue to look at best practices in policing and continue dialogue with communities within our city.
Balancing growth: What improvements do District 3 candidates propose?
Phoenix is experiencing tremendous growth particularly in north and south Phoenix. How do you ensure that adequate attention and care is paid to District 3, and what improvements in the area would you push for?
Millan: With tremendous growth comes challenges, and opportunities. Challenges include keeping up with roadway maintenance and improvements. In North Central Phoenix, I would specifically like to see the removal of the reverse lanes on Seventh Avenue and Seventh Street, which are confusing to new residents and visitors, and extremely dangerous for all — not to mention extremely detrimental to businesses along those two important corridors. As for opportunities, my vision for District 3 includes fostering growth for existing businesses and attracting new enterprises. Currently, many of our residents find themselves traveling to Downtown Phoenix or Scottsdale for dining, services, and leisure activities. To ensure the vitality and prosperity of our local neighborhoods and commercial areas, we need to encourage more residents to shop, dine, and enjoy recreational activities within our district. To accomplish this, I propose promoting mixed-use development projects that offer clear advantages for both businesses and the broader community. This approach aims to create vibrant, self-sustaining areas within our district, reducing the need for residents to seek services elsewhere. By cultivating a diverse local economy, we can enhance the quality of life for our residents while boosting economic opportunities within District 3.
Stark: During the most recent Bond Election, D3 was available to benefit particularly with a new fire station that will in turn enable the old station to become an operation center for CAP. I listen to our constituents. During last year’s budget cycle, we heard from D3 the need for a cricket field. Our District will be the home of the first cricket field in the city, one of the fastest growing sports in America. A few years ago, I worked with the Boards of Supervisors in improving the “small grants program” at the Maricopa County Flood Control District which will allocate more money for localized flooding issues that plague parts of D3. I fully intend to take advantage of that grant program.
Priorities: Why are you running for Phoenix council?
Why are you running for Phoenix City Council, and what is your first priority?
Betty Guardado, incumbent: I first decided to run for office to uplift working families. I have now held the position for five years and built a strong foundation for moving the district forward. In partnership with neighborhoods across our community, we have chalked up many wins and built a robust vision for our long-term goals. My first priority will always be to increase the quality of life in Phoenix.
JJ Martinez, challenger: My decision to run for Phoenix City Council District 5 came from conversations with community leaders, small business owners, and my family. As someone born and raised in this district, I’ve seen many changes, but sadly, not all for the better. I had the honor of serving this district in the Phoenix Police Department for 26 years, with 4 additional years as a reserve. I held roles including Patrol Officer, Domestic Violence Detective, Traffic Enforcement Officer, and School Resource Officer. These experiences gave me a deep understanding of our community’s needs and how to implement swift, effective solutions. Running for council in my hometown is a great honor. My background in public service and knowledge of local issues will allow me to drive meaningful change and raise the standards of governance. We deserve better. My focus will be addressing the interconnected issues of crime, the opioid epidemic, and homelessness. These challenges require a comprehensive, strategic approach. We need more than piecemeal solutions that haven’t made our community safer over the past few years. It’s time for real, impactful change.
Inspiration: Who shapes the Phoenix council candidates’ thinking?
Who in public life, past or present, do you admire most? Why? And what lesson do you draw from that person’s experience?
Guardado: Dolores Huerta is a long-time hero of mine. I admire her because she is strong in her convictions while never losing her true north and delivering real results.
Martinez: My sources of inspiration have always been my parents, Antonia and Jesse Martinez. Their resilience and perseverance were always traits that emboldened me to work hard and to follow my dream of joining law enforcement. Never did my parents set limitations nor did they ever make excuses for the successes that they encountered. This was because they worked tirelessly and I get to see this every single day when I am knocking on doors. Many times I speak to District 5 voters who just got home from a long day of work, and I am reminded of my father. Tired from driving the Phoenix City Bus but with the strength to continue providing a better life for his family.
Taxing and spending: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
If you were faced with a steep budget deficit and you had to either raise taxes or cut services, which, specifically, would you consider first and why?
Guardado: I think it is important to maintain city services and continue looking for ways to streamline and improve efficiency. We are still feeling the effects of 2008 in this regard. Unfortunately, when we cut services, our remaining departments are left wearing too many hats. This leaves them overburdened, over worked, and saddled with unfunded mandates. We fall into this trap expecting too much from them – whether it’s our first responders or any essential workers, they feel it the most.
Martinez: It is always an unfortunate scenario when a governmental entity is faced with a deficit because the most affected are always its constituents. My approach would be to carefully assess the city’s budget line item by line item, dollar by dollar. We must try to avoid cutting services that are most important to the families that we serve. This is why I will always advocate for putting money in a rainy day fund when the City of Phoenix finds itself in a surplus. We must never put a burden on the taxpayer when they are already having to put some strains on their personal pockets.
Election integrity: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
Do you think Arizona elections are fairly run? Do you trust the results? Will you abide by them? Why or why not?
Guardado: I do believe our election system is run with integrity. We have had true public servants from different political backgrounds work tirelessly to provide honest results. I trust them to run fair elections.
Martinez: Time and time again, it has been proven in the courts that the elections have been run safely and securely. We must not feed into the divisiveness that this topic has had on our society. Instead, we must promote civil discourse and unify around the fact that we live in a country where we are afforded freedom of speech and expression and that we can vote in a democracy for who we think is the best candidate based on our values.
Affordable housing: What are Phoenix council candidates’ plans to help?
Despite efforts by city staff and the City Council to address the housing crisis by easing the process for builders and incentivizing affordable housing, the shortage and lack of affordability persists. How do you propose solving this crisis, and what roles do you believe both the city and the state should play in addressing the issue?
Guardado: There must be a multipronged approach to effectively address the crisis of a growing unhoused community. This issue demands immediate and comprehensive strategies which encompass housing solutions, support services, and community engagement. It is imperative that we collaborate with local organizations, government agencies, and stakeholders to implement sustainable solutions that not only provide shelter but also address the underlying causes of homelessness. I do feel we can be more proactive on this issue. I will continue to be a champion for those most vulnerable to becoming unsheltered. I will prioritize more resources to be used on preventative solutions like behavioral and mental health, rental assistance and eviction prevention.
Martinez: To effectively address this crisis, it is essential to engage a diverse range of stakeholders. This includes coordinated efforts at all levels of government, each of which plays a critical role. A component that I believe is lacking is the communication between the city and the state. Preemption has limited the city from the autonomy to best serve its constituents. There should be a deep understanding of each entity’s functionality for their constituents. Besides implementing and enforcing zoning reforms, streamlining permitting processes, and creating targeted incentives for affordable housing development we can work with school districts to make use of land for workforce housing. Additionally, input from developers specializing in affordable housing is crucial. These developers possess expertise that can inform practical solutions and innovative approaches to building and maintaining affordable housing. Ultimately, a collaborative strategy that leverages the strengths and resources of all these stakeholders is necessary to create sustainable and effective solutions to the housing crisis.
Police reform: Where do Phoenix council candidates stand on federal oversight?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into the City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department and found multiple constitutional violations related to discrimination and excessive use of force. How do you feel about federal oversight of the Phoenix police, and what do you think the city should do to improve Phoenix policing and repair trust with those wary of the department?
Guardado: I have personally read the report and discussed the findings with colleagues and city leadership. The DOJ said they would like to work constructively with city officials, and I hope that is exactly what they will do. Like the DOJ, we are committed to the principles of justice and protecting the civil rights of everyone in our city. That is why we have worked together as a council to chart a path forward, engaging our communities and first responders to bring forth many reforms meant to address the very concerns the DOJ has. While it is still early in the process of deliberating on a report that took years to produce, we are working diligently to process the report properly while considering the best way forward for our residents. The only way to move forward is through collaboration.
Martinez: The findings from the DOJ investigation and the subsequent consent decree are indeed a challenging development, especially given the longstanding reputation and commendations that the Phoenix Police Department has received. It’s disheartening to see such discrepancies between the department’s historically praised practices and the recent assessment. The department’s proactive measures, such as the policy change following the Fruitvale Station shooting to mitigate equipment-related errors, demonstrate its commitment to continuous improvement. As we move forward, it is crucial for both the department and city officials to engage critically with the findings and advocate for a balanced approach that addresses legitimate concerns while acknowledging the department’s efforts and historical achievements. Constructive dialogue and evidence-based adjustments will be essential in aligning with the consent decree’s goals while maintaining the department’s integrity and effectiveness. We must bring members of our community and law enforcement together. Relationships to ensure transparency and accountability, meanwhile keeping our neighborhoods safe are vital. I will serve as a bridge between the two and build much needed trust. Rather than drive a wedge by politicizing and placing policies on the dais that divert from progress.
District needs: What are the top priorities for District 5?
District 5 has seen big economic development efforts in the I-17 and Northern Avenue area, as well as pushes for more public safety along the 27th Avenue corridor. What work do you believe still needs to be done to improve District 5, and how would you ensure progress is made, if elected?
Guardado: The first meeting I had when taking office was with Jeff Spellman from the VIP Coalition — representing neighborhood groups along this corridor. We drafted a plan to increase public safety and address the most pressing issues of the area. This collaboration led to a $8.7 million investment called the Safe PHX Corridor, leveraging technology and community-based resources to improve quality of life for residents. This included opening two Real Time Operation Centers serving 19th & 27th Avenue. However, we knew it didn’t end there. I have always believed we need comprehensive solutions to solve complex issues. We invested over $25 million in a workforce training center now being called Innovation 27. This will take a vacant building in the area and upskill individuals to learn new trades. We also invested into new housing & services for those experiencing homelessness and increased outreach efforts.
Martinez: The challenges of crime, drug abuse, and sex trafficking continue to persist on the 27th Avenue corridor. Assault, burglary with firearms, prostitution, and human trafficking are almost a commonality of this area. It should not be this way nor should any elected official turn a blind eye to it. Instead, we must provide the necessary steps to take action against those illegal efforts, such as a comprehensive strategy to improve both recruitment and retention within the force. These issues are highly visible to taxpayers, and they want it to change. It is counterproductive to allocate tax dollars towards revitalization efforts without concurrently addressing the inadequacies that these families and small business owners face. Additionally, it is crucial to engage in candid discussions regarding these challenges to develop effective solutions.
Priorities: Why are you running for Phoenix council?
Why are you running for Phoenix City Council, and what is your first priority?
Martyn Bridgeman: As a native Phoenician who grew up in District 7, I’ve witnessed first-hand both the vibrant spirit of its people and the missed opportunities that have prevented it from reaching its full potential. I believe that District 7 can become the crown jewel of Phoenix’s district system. We’re blessed with vibrant neighborhoods full of character that should be strengthened, not undermined by misguided public policies. I personally know of the disparities within our district, and I’m committed to addressing them with the support of the dedicated people in District 7. Our strength is tied to how we uplift our most challenged neighborhoods, recognizing that a one-size-fits-all approach isn’t effective. From knocking on more than 3,000 doors in our district, residents have told me that they are seeking a councilperson who is willing to listen, cares about their issues and will be their voice at City Hall. I plan to advocate on their behalf and put the needs of District 7 on center stage. It is both a passion and commitment of mine to change the perception of a district that is the most diverse in the city with a built-in reservoir of opportunity and goodwill.
Anna Hernandez: I am running for Phoenix City Council because it provides an opportunity to influence the city budget to be more equitable and fight for investments that our communities need. Being a council member provides a greater opportunity to have an immediate impact on bettering the material conditions of the residents of the district.
Michael Nowakowski, former councilman: I decided to run for Phoenix City Council because I am tired of seeing District 7 being denied its fair share. Residents in District 7 have said to me that they have seen little progress in the past four years. For example, it is not fair that the Phoenix light rail system has been built and finished in the northwest part of the city, while the residents of south Phoenix and downtown Phoenix are still waiting for their part of the light rail expansion to be built. Residents in District 7 regularly approach me asking for help with city issues; they have repeatedly encouraged me over the years to return to City Council. I decided to run for this position because – although the other candidates are good candidates with good intentions – I am the only candidate with 13 years of experience and a track record of showing that I can advocate and fight for District 7. I am known for listening to different points of view, finding common ground, and getting things done. My priority is to get residents in District 7 what they deserve. This includes safe neighborhoods and parks, high-wage jobs, more support for small businesses, and more affordable housing options.
Marcelino Quinonez: I entered public service because I have been fortunate enough to experience the American Dream and I want to make sure that every Phoenecian has the opportunity to seize it and make it a reality. I decided to run for the city council because I want to advocate for the same causes I fought for in the legislature and as a teacher in a position that enables me to affect immediate and impactful change. My chief focus is community engagement and constituent services. I believe that in order to work toward my other priorities (such as housing affordability, public safety, job creation, etc) it is essential to increase the participation and trust of the community in their city government. If elected, I will always have an open mind and an open door, ready to assist however I can.
Inspiration: Who shapes the Phoenix council candidates’ thinking?
Who in public life, past or present, do you admire most? Why? And what lesson do you draw from that person’s experience?
Bridgeman: I most admire my mother, Marchelle Franklin who retired from the City of Phoenix in December 2023 after 23 years of service. She held many leadership positions during her tenure at the City of Phoenix, including Director of Human Services, Director of Community Affairs for the Phoenix Police Department and Chief of Staff for Mayor Phil Gordon. What I admire most about her is the unwavering respect and accolades she earned from both community members and elected officials throughout her years of service in Phoenix. She is known for her straightforward approach to life and work, respected leadership style and her integrity. Her commitment to keeping her word and avoiding political games has earned her deep admiration. By simply watching her, I learned a number of important life lessons – the importance of not being reactionary, treating everyone I encounter with dignity and respect, as well as honoring commitments. However, the most important lesson that I’ve learned from my mother is to let your actions be a reflection of your character.
Hernandez: Did not answer.
Nowakowski: I especially admire Dolores Huerta and Cesar Chavez. They created the United Farmworkers Union to fight for the farmworker’s fair share of resources. I chose these two public figures because they are a calming force. They have the ability to work across party lines to accomplish their goals and they can find common ground among people with different viewpoints. I was able to work with Dolores and Cesar and they taught me how to be a servant leader. They taught me that when you have a position of power, you must use it to benefit the community. They also taught me that you can create more good things for your community when you can find common ground to build from. They always told me to never fight about what’s different but rather focus on what we agree on.
Quinonez: I was first inspired to seek public office after reading a biography of President Kennedy in the 8th grade and he has been an idol of mine ever since. The hopeful youth and optimism of his administration captivated me and gave me an appreciation for the impact one person can make. Additionally, he challenged the entire country to ask what we can all do for each other as opposed to asking what others can do for us. The principles he stood for and the promise he represented serve as a constant reminder of the importance and challenge of public life and underscores its triumphs and perils to the farthest extremes.
Taxing and spending: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
If you were faced with a steep budget deficit and you had to either raise taxes or cut services, which, specifically, would you consider first and why?
Bridgeman: It is the state who have sought to balance their budget at the expense of the taxpayers of Phoenix by removing the city’s revenue stream like the rental tax and cutting back on other state shared revenues earmarked to cities and towns putting into jeopardy the financial wellbeing of these communities including Phoenix. We are then left with a tradeoff of public safety and quality of life and a degradation of our way of life. That is not a tradeoff I am not willing to make. I remain committed to Public Safety, programs for youth and seniors, arts and culture and other activities that define who we are as a city that makes living, working and playing in the City of Phoenix a desirable place to be. If this means a modest tax increase to maintain this social commitment to our way of life in Phoenix that is something that I am prepared to support and make.
Hernandez: Phoenix works with a nearly $6 billion budget. In the situation of a deficit, I believe it would be imperative to look at the current budget to identify areas of opportunity that would prevent raising taxes or cutting services to residents. I would support looking at an increase in a sales tax if we are unable to resolve the deficit and would make every attempt possible to ensure services are not cut.
Nowakowski: If the council was faced with a steep budget deficit and I had to either raise taxes or cut services, I would first work to create a zero budget for the City of Phoenix to determine what is needed rather than what is wanted. There are fundamental services and extra amenities that the City of Phoenix provides; some of the fundamental services include: public safety (police, fire department, and court system), infrastructure (transportation, water, energy), and waste management. After we created a budget that provides fundamental services to residents, then we could use any extra funds to provide extra amenities. I will not support raising taxes unless we have gone through the budget with a fine-tooth comb. It’s important to audit ourselves and look at other revenue streams such as county, state, and federal grants. If none of these options help and we are not able to provide residents with the extra amenities they desire to have, then my last resort would be to create a tax and/or a fee for those amenities.
Quinonez: If faced with a deficit I would explore every viable option to ensure that our city’s budget can continue to provide necessary services to all Phoenicians. Arriving at a decision over tax hikes or spending cuts cannot be done effectively without the input of the community and I would host various town halls and forums to get their direct input and ultimately take my cue from my neighbors.
Election integrity: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
Do you think Arizona elections are fairly run? Do you trust the results? Will you abide by them? Why or why not?
Bridgeman: I believe that Arizona’s elections are conducted fairly, and I trust and will respect the results. The election process includes safeguards and ballot samples to make sure that every vote is counted. Voters also have the ability to track their ballot, which increases the level of transparency that we all deserve to have during an election season
Hernandez: I have served in the Senate Elections committee for the last 2 years and have seen firsthand the many individuals that look to sow division and fear in our election systems by parroting conspiracy theories and refusing to accept the results simply because they do not like the result of one race. We cannot encourage those actions. I absolutely believe that elections in Arizona are fair, and I will trust and respect the results.
Nowakowski: I have run three times for city council; all three races were open and transparent with no flaws. Whenever I had a question, the City Clerk’s Office was always helpful. I am now running in my fourth election for District 7. I believe Arizona elections are fairly executed, and I will trust the results and abide by them.
Quinonez: I would not be running for this office if I did not believe in the efficacy of our elections. I know Arizona’s elections are secure and accurate because I have met and served with individuals on the front line of protecting our democracy at the ballot box. They have time and time again done an outstanding job preserving our right to democratic representation, seeking fair elections beyond party politics. I will trust and abide by the results of our election because I know the outcome on November fifth will be the will of the voters.
Affordable housing: What are Phoenix council candidates’ plans to help?
Despite efforts by city staff and the City Council to address the housing crisis by easing the process for builders and incentivizing affordable housing, the shortage and lack of affordability persists. How do you propose solving this crisis, and what roles do you believe both the city and the state should play in addressing the issue?
Bridgeman: The shortage of affordable housing is a city and statewide issue. There should be a partnership between the City of Phoenix, the state legislature and other municipalities to design legislation meant to increase the number of affordable housing units while not deterring local developers, who are good stewards of the community. When creating affordable housing, it is imperative that this issue does not solely fall on the shoulders of Phoenix alone.
Hernandez: At the city level, I believe we need to clear away outdated laws that would allow the creation of more units at all income levels. We should encourage more infill projects as well as more diverse housing types. The city should make key investment into technology that would assist in streamlining the approval process. I believe that both the city and state have a great responsibility to work together to find paths to more housing solutions. Cities must be proactive in implementing changes and approving projects that will create more housing. At the state level, more tools must be given to cities such as inclusionary zoning as just one example.
Nowakowski: First of all, the affordable housing issue is an issue that affects the federal and state levels. That said, as a city councilmember, we can make Phoenix more affordable. The first thing we must do is sit down with elected officials from the federal, state, county, and city levels to come up with a plan on how we can fix this issue. To do this, we must put political parties to the side and focus on giving residents the ability to have less expensive rent and become homeowners. Once we do that, then we will have access to resources from the federal, state, county, and city to create a long-term solution to the current affordable housing crisis. As a city, we can take steps on our own to make Phoenix more affordable. What I’d like to do is use old properties that haven’t been used in 10+ years and turn them into affordable housing units for residents. Contractors who are trying to build affordable housing have said that the process takes way too long and is becoming too expensive. We need to improve the process and make it easier to get affordable housing plans off the ground.
Quinonez: It is important to understand that housing looks different for every individual. Through my work at St. Vincent de Paul, I helped individuals find the home that best fit them and came to understand the many dimensions of the housing issue. I believe that we should continue to utilize state and federal resources like low-income housing tax credits (LIHTC) and continue to explore federal programs through HUD to ensure Phoenicians can make the dream of owning a home a reality. Additionally, we must partner with city, state, and nationally based non-profit organizations to ensure our neighbors are receiving as much support, like financial literacy training, as possible. I am proud of what Phoenix has already done to address a national issue and believe we can provide further solutions by taking advantage of every available resource.
Police reform: Where do Phoenix council candidates stand on federal oversight?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into the City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department and found multiple constitutional violations related to discrimination and excessive use of force. How do you feel about federal oversight of the Phoenix police, and what do you think the city should do to improve Phoenix policing and repair trust with those wary of the department?
Bridgeman: After reading the DOJ report. I believe that the City of Phoenix and the Phoenix Police Department need to develop a comprehensive plan has quantitative goals that focuses on the internal and external support and controls of the Phoenix Police Department. This plan should be thoughtful and proactive, rather than reactionary or swayed by public opinion (whether you support the Phoenix Police Department or not). This plan must promote collaboration, strategies on how to positively advance the city, and address community concerns, while giving officers the support they need, and our citizens the protection they deserve.
Hernandez: The report clearly shows that oversight and accountability are desperately needed in Phoenix. I believe that the city and the police department have to be open to working with community leaders that have worked for years on advocating for changes to address the grave issues that exist in the department. I also believe they have to be willing to implement robust changes that will not have a negative financial impact on the city budget and that would create a path that would allow for officers that abuse the badge and fail to follow procedures to be held accountable.
Nowakowski: While I was on City Council, I was the Chair for Public Safety for 8 years. We were known for our great community engagement with the police department. Now, four years later, Phoenix Police was investigated and found to have engaged in a “pattern or practice” of violating constitutional and civil rights. This is something I do not understand. There are situations where police did do wrong and the Phoenix Police Department agrees that those officers must be held accountable. Our police officers need to be held to the highest standard. I believe that as a city and police department, we can handle this situation on our own. I believe that our police department was being tasked with things that they were not trained to do. For example, the police have been tasked with wellness checks; in the past, wellness checks were provided by the State Department of Health. Now, the police are tasked with that. The police are not trained to deal with mentally ill individuals; they are trained to enforce the law when someone calls 911. I believe that, as a city, we can fix this situation. There just needs to be clear channels of communication and responsibilities.
Quinonez: In order to repair the trust gap between residents and the police department, I believe that we must engage with our communities in the reform process as much as possible and use that input to guide our path forward. I will endeavor to do all I can to create an open, wide-reaching dialogue between the Police Department, the city, and its residents. In order to establish trust, we must focus on transparency, technology, and training to ensure our department is better equipped to serve the community and the residents have faith in their officers. To that end, I do not support the consent decree because I believe Phoenix taxpayer dollars are best used to determine our path forward when handled by Phoenix residents. Community change can only truly come from those who are a part of it.
Balancing growth: What priorities do Phoenix council candidates have for District 7?
Tremendous growth is underway and expected to continue in District 7, particularly along the South Mountain Loop 202 freeway. What does responsible development mean to you, and how will you ensure new residents are welcomed but also that growth benefits and does not harm existing residents?
Bridgeman: Responsible development means making sure there is a design standard for development that blends the agricultural feel of Laveen, while also embracing its urban aspect. This also involves enforcing design standards even after building is completed, which places accountability on the property owner. As City Councilman, I will advocate for the creation of spaces specifically for locally owned businesses within the district, helping them thrive and give back to the community. Responsible development also involves incorporating and implementing recommendations from neighborhood groups, as well as the Laveen & Estrella Village Planning Committees. As a Councilman, that also means that I will meet with constituents and show up to various neighborhoods to hear directly from the people. Finally, with whatever development is on the horizon, there must be a tangible community benefit.
Hernandez: Responsible growth to me is ensuring that we are bringing in the resources that the residents would like to see and are in need of. It is also ensuring that the development that is being created is also re-investing into the surrounding communities. This can be achieved by ensuring that direct contact is happening with current residents as well as the needed education is done so that the residents are knowledgeable on the benefits of new development, new residents, and ensuring they are heard. Steady and transparent communication will be key in making the future growth of D7 successful for all the residents and city as a whole.
Nowakowski: As one of the advocates for the Ed Pastor South Mountain Loop 202 freeway, what we need to do first is work on our infrastructure. When we look at the surrounding areas next to the 202 freeway, we need wider streets, sewer lines, and electricity for our tech corridor. We have tech companies that want to come to District 7 to create high-wage jobs for residents, but they cannot because we do not have the electricity and power. Next, as more people continue to move to Phoenix and District 7, we need to sit down with the state and county to fix our roads. We must avoid long traffic jams by increasing the number of lanes on the exits of the freeway. It is ridiculous that you exit off the freeway into a one-lane road when we should have at least two to three lanes. Lastly, we must provide our residents with more restaurants, retail, and entertainment venues along the freeway to spur economic growth, create jobs, and enhance the quality of life for our community.
Quinonez: I believe District 7 is ripe for growth because of our incredible people, location, and cultures represented throughout the district. For me, economic development is critical because I want to make sure my neighbors have the resources to thrive in our city. This cannot happen without high quality, high paying jobs that respect and treat their workers fairly. I believe we must diversify our economic opportunities throughout the district to include the manufacturing, retail, service, and technology sectors. The area surrounding South Mountain Loop 202 could easily, and should, become a technology sector for the entire city. I would work to promote a direct line of support for TSMC needs in north Phoenix through our efforts in District 7. I have pledged an open mind and an open door as a councilmember and would always engage neighbors in my decisions to develop any project, to me that is the only responsible approach to the work.
Priorities: Why are you running for Phoenix council?
Why are you running for Phoenix City Council, and what is your first priority?
Ann O’Brien, unopposed incumbent: My advocacy work began with my two children as a stay-at-home mom. Gradually I began advocating for their entire class and eventually at the school level. Before I knew it, I was running for the Deer Valley Unified School District School Board where I was representing more than 32,000 children and nearly 4,000 staff members. When the opportunity to run for Phoenix City Council came in 2020, I knew it was the next step in continuing to work with and help my community. Next to being a mom, being District 1’s councilwoman is the best job I have had! Helping my community members is incredibly gratifying, and I am dedicated to ensuring my District and the City continue to be a great place to live, work, and play. Choosing just one priority is difficult as all the pieces to the puzzle are important! I will continue to work on our housing crisis, support our first responders, and work diligently to implement my Homelessness plan.
Inspiration: Who shapes the Phoenix council candidates’ thinking?
Who in public life, past or present, do you admire most? Why? And what lesson do you draw from that person’s experience?
O’Brien: There isn’t a singular person I admire most, more like the actions of a person in public life that I admire. I would rather focus on being 30% your friend than 70% your enemy. Because in that 30 percent where we agree, we can create a difference and make real change to policy impacting peoples’ lives for the better. In that sense, I admire public officials who sometimes must make the hard decisions and go against their political party to do what’s right and necessary in the moment. Some examples of people I admire are Senator (Kyrsten) Sinema and former Governor (Jan) Brewer. In 2013, Governor Brewer worked with a coalition of Democrats and Republicans to expand Medicaid. Senator Sinema opposed her former Democratic colleagues in the Senate multiple times, working with Republicans to build a strong coalition to get control of the southern border and when she refused to remove the filibuster rules, knowing it would lead to long-term policy instability as power shifted back and forth across the aisle. I pledge to work with whoever walks through my door if it means making a positive difference to the lives of current and future citizens.
Taxing and spending: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
If you were faced with a steep budget deficit and you had to either raise taxes or cut services, which, specifically, would you consider first and why?
If facing a budget shortfall, I think the first thing we should always look at is where can we cut? What aspect of each department’s budget has consistently been underperforming or over projected budgets. The reality is, we will be facing a budget deficit in the next fiscal year thanks to the State Legislature’s removal of rental tax. In saving the average renter $7.50 a week, it’s costed the City of Phoenix a projected $92 million in the first year. That’s significant! As a result of this anticipated deficit, we’ve asked the departments to present future budgets with a five percent reduction – three percent for our public safety departments. In addition, new revenue sources may need to be identified in order to help stop the bleeding created by state legislators. At a $92 million deficit the first year and growing every year after that, we cannot cut our way out of this very real problem. I’m committed to understanding all the different streams of revenue the City currently takes in to find that right balance between potential new revenue sources and necessary department budget cuts.
Election integrity: Where do the Phoenix council candidates stand?
Do you think Arizona elections are fairly run? Do you trust the results? Will you abide by them? Why or why not?
I do believe Arizona elections are fairly executed. I do trust the results and will abide by them.
Affordable housing: What are Phoenix council candidates’ plans to help?
Despite efforts by city staff and the City Council to address the housing crisis by easing the process for builders and incentivizing affordable housing, the shortage and lack of affordability persists. How do you propose solving this crisis, and what roles do you believe both the city and the state should play in addressing the issue?
Let’s be clear, there’s not going to be one solution to solve this crisis. It will take a myriad of approaches from deregulations to cutting red tape to thinking outside the box and looking at what our neighboring states are doing differently. However, we must tackle the root cause for why some of these missing middle and first-time homebuyer products aren’t currently being built today in areas where already allowed.
One of the ways I’ve recently learned that can provide relief to our housing crisis is to modify our construction defect laws. Shared wall, starter home products, like townhomes and condominiums, are not being built in Arizona, as compared to some of our other neighboring states. With our current laws, developers find it nearly impossible to get insured on these communities at an affordable rate. If these developers can’t get insured, they can’t build these products. The current state laws are strangling the market and preventing young first-time homebuyers from being able to start their homebuying journey. I’ll be working closely with the State Legislature this year to bring a change to the current law and get this product back to production here in Phoenix.
Police reform: Where do Phoenix council candidates stand on federal oversight?
The Department of Justice concluded its investigation into the City of Phoenix and Phoenix Police Department and found multiple constitutional violations related to discrimination and excessive use of force. How do you feel about federal oversight of the Phoenix police, and what do you think the city should do to improve Phoenix policing and repair trust with those wary of the department?
A court-ordered consent decree is not the best option for Phoenix families and businesses. On June 13, 2024, in a press conference regarding the City of Phoenix Police Department, Kristen Clarke, the United States Assistant Attorney General, stated, “We are committed to working collaboratively with the police department, city officials and the public to institute reform and remedy the violations we identified in our investigation.” I look forward to working towards finding a solution that provides reform and maintains local control of our police department and City Budget.
However, that does not mean we are waiting for the DOJ to tell us what to do. The Mayor and City Council approved the creation of the Office of Accountability and Transparency and the Civilian Review Board. Three years ago, the Mayor and Council approved $15 million to expand our Community Assistance Program to ensure the people other than police officers were available to respond to behavior health emergency calls. City leadership is committed to implementing best practices, evaluating those practices, and making adjustments and changes to ensure Phoenix residents are receiving the best services possible from the police department.
Balancing growth: What priorities do Phoenix council candidates have for District 1?
District 1 is facing immense development changes as TSMC undergoes construction and as the former Metro Center mall area redevelops. What challenges do you see in District 1’s future, and how are you working for the best possible outcomes? Please be specific.
I think the most significant challenge to District 1 is shared citywide – and that’s housing. However, there’s more to the housing problem than just the lack units. With housing comes the need for infrastructure. We need wastewater treatment plants to collect and clean the sewage; water treatment plants to make the water we get from the canals safe to drink; roads and bridges; and parks and public facilities to provide recreation. All of this comes with additional housing, but the ability and cost to build them has created concerns.
In North Phoenix, as a result of TSMC, we’re experiencing an explosion of growth! Already, large swaths of land have begun developing for future single-family communities – some as large as 1,400 homes! In just one area of my district, over the next ten years, we are projecting over 12,000 housing units. This has caused an urgent need to ensure the city has the infrastructure available for these future residents. We can’t expect to place the burden entirely onto the developer and expect these homes to remain affordable and attainable to the next generation of homebuyers. This will require partnerships between the Council and the private sector to properly get this done.
Taylor Seely covers Phoenix for The Arizona Republic / azcentral.com. Reach her at tseely@arizonarepublic.com or by phone at 480-476-6116.